ΓΝΩΡΙΜΙΑ - ΕΠΑΦΗ

Το ιστολόγιο Πενταλιά πήρε το όνομα
από το όμορφο και ομώνυμο χωριό της Κύπρου.
Για την επικοινωνία μαζί μας
είναι στη διάθεσή σας το ηλεκτρονικό ταχυδρομείο:
pentalia74@gmail.com

dimanche 23 février 2014

Τουρκία : Ο απολυταρχισμός του Ερντογάν












ÖMER TAŞPINAR
o.taspinar@todayszaman.com
ÖMER TAŞPINAR

Can external pressure stop authoritarianism?


In the absence of domestic checks and balances against growing authoritarianism at home, many critics of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government hope that external dynamics may play a mitigating role.
The question of whether the EU and Washington should get more vocal in their criticism of Ankara depends on whether these external actors have some leverage to impact the actions of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. For instance, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso told Erdoğan during the Turkish leader's first visit to Brussels in five years, in January 2014, that respect for rule of law and independence of the judiciary were essential conditions for EU membership.
Will such friendly warnings have an impact? The short answer is “no.” Turkey took its most serious reformist legislative steps toward EU membership between 2003 and 2005, during the AKP's first term and when there was strong momentum to begin accession. Today, neither Ankara nor Brussels are very optimistic about membership prospects. There are serious obstacles, ranging from Cyprus to negative French and German public opinion about Turkish membership that complicate the future of Turkey-EU relations.

The fact Turkey itself lost its enthusiasm and that Europe is unable to recover from its economic slump are additional negative factors. As a result, the EU lost its leverage and soft power over Turkish politics.
What about Washington's potential impact on Turkish politics? Some argue that it is high time for the Barack Obama administration to speak up in defense of Turkish democracy. An open letter signed by a number of American NGOs (including Freedom House) and influential opinion makers made exactly this point earlier this month. Yet, it looks like the White House is not listening. After months of almost no contact, President Obama had his first phone conversation with Erdoğan last week. The readout of the call indicates that the dialogue was pretty much business as usual with references to all the regular regional issues (Syria, Iraq, Cyprus, Israel, etc.) and only one sentence at the end that suggests at least Obama mentioned something about Turkey's internal dynamics: “The President noted the importance of sound policies rooted in the rule of law to reassure the financial markets, nurture a predictable investment environment, strengthen bilateral ties, and benefit the future of Turkey,” according to a White House statement.
Needless to say, this was not the kind of conversation critics expected. This once again showed that Washington gets involved in the domestic problems of a country only when there are massive demonstrations and potential for violence in the streets caused by governmental action. What Washington sees in Erdoğan is a mercurial, erratic and embattled Turkish leader willing to resort to the wildest conspiracy theories to attack his domestic opponents. It is therefore not surprising that Washington does not wish to provide ammunition to his conspiracies by publicly criticizing him.
Under such circumstances, neither Washington nor Brussels seem to have much leverage with Erdoğan. This is why, at the end of the day, Turkey's own domestic dynamics will matter much more than the reaction coming from the West. The fact that Obama linked his rule of law warning to financial markets is quite telling. He must probably think that, despite all his authoritarian tendencies, Erdoğan has also proven to be a pragmatic politician. The Turkish prime minister knows that the deterioration of the Turkish economy will impact his electoral fortunes. It is not in his interest to fuel the image of a country in constant political crisis.
If the economic dynamics of the country continue, Erdoğan may suddenly rediscover the importance of Turkey's EU journey as a stamp of approval on Turkey's investment climate. Such a return to the EU reform agenda would also provide a face-saving excuse for Erdoğan to stop his authoritarian policies. At the end of the day, Turkey's American and European friends must still place their hopes in the belief that Turkey has come too far in its integration with the global economy to turn aggressively authoritarian in its domestic politics. Time will tell, but hope is not a strategy.

ZAMAN,
23 February 2014,

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire